Skip to main content

Saving HOPE

Since its creation in 1993, Georgia’s HOPE program has provided $5 billion worth of benefits to over 1.2 million students.

The idea behind the Helping Outstanding Pupils Educationally (HOPE) program was that deserving students should have the opportunity to continue their education. The program also has the added benefit of keeping Georgia’s best and brightest students in the state which is critical for our future economic success.

The problem now, as with so many other government programs, is that HOPE is facing serious financial difficulties.

In his inaugural address last week, Gov. Nathan Deal vowed to save HOPE. In his State of the State address which followed two days later, Deal said if current spending patterns continue, the program will be unable to meet its obligations by 2013.

“If we are to save HOPE we must make programmatic changes during this legislative session,” Deal said. “I am ready and your leadership has indicated they are ready to make those changes. My 2012 budget does not authorize HOPE expenditures beyond what the lottery produces; therefore, we must act now to maintain the Georgia jewel known as HOPE.”

The question is how can this “Georgia jewel” be saved?

To be eligible for HOPE, high school students must have at least a 3.0 average in core curriculum classes. In the 2008-2009 school year – the most recent year for which data is currently available – 38 percent of Georgia high school graduates were HOPE eligible.

Are 38 percent of Georgia’s students truly “outstanding” or are we jeopardizing HOPE to provide billions of dollars in benefits for students who are not truly prepared for the rigors of college?

Over 23 percent of Georgia high school graduates required some form of remedial instruction upon entering the University System of Georgia in 2008. That number alone would seem to indicate that HOPE resources may be poorly allocated.

According to the most recent report from the University System of Georgia, almost half of HOPE scholars lose their scholarships at the 30-hour checkpoint. Six years later (yes, SIX), only 54 percent of these students will graduate from college.

Instead of slashing benefits and instituting means based criteria for HOPE, perhaps the focus should be on giving the scholarships to those students who have a better chance of collegiate success.

The state has already worked to cut the cost of the HOPE program by cutting fees payments and book allowances. The current book allowance is so ridiculously low that it is doubtful many students could even pay for one new textbook much less all the books needed for any given semester. No HOPE funds are provided for room and board – an expense that easily exceeds tuition costs at most institutions.

Instead of tacitly encouraging our best and brightest to seek better scholarship opportunities out of state, the resources of HOPE should be redirected to keeping the truly outstanding students home. The benefits should be improved, not cut, and they should be given to the most outstanding of pupils. These students are tomorrow’s innovators, business owners and political leaders. We need a program that recognizes that fact and works first to help those who will in turn help Georgia most.

Kristi Reed 2011. All Rights Reserved.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Now is not the time to give up

The sound was mournful; “I am giving up.” The young man I overheard talking on an elevator caught my attention because he was talking loudly, wanting all within hearing distance to know of his decision to quit. I could not help but engage him in conversation about his decision to quit by throwing in the towel and giving up. As I spoke with him, I heard what has become familiar speech from other people with whom I have spoken. This young person was talking about the never ending cycle of disappointment regarding the political issues we are facing in our country now. “They are all lazy, stubborn, and wrong,” this young man went on expressing his opinion to me about what he observed on the national level in the political world. As I talked more with this young man, I asked him about his level of involvement. To which he answered, “I never vote.” “I don’t understand politics,” he said. To which I then asked, “Let me get this right, you are throwing in what towel?” I am amazed at the num...

Gambling is too great a risk

It does not take anyone with superior intelligence to understand when money is dangled in front of people, most of the time, they will take the bait. With the outcome of the vote on the Republican ballot about expanding gambling, there are people who are pushing harder to open a casino. According to the Secretary of State’s web site 31.34% of the registered voters or 1,636,371 people voted in the Primary last week. Out of that number 955, 857 voted on question number one on the Republican ballot. That question, you will remember, asked if we had more gambling with money going to education, would we approve such a move. 480,313 voted yes and 475,544 voted no. The difference in the vote was 4,769. 50.25% voted yes and 49.75% voted no. With one half of one percent voting in favor over those who opposed the question, the gambling crowd was ready to crow about the overwhelming victory. The willing media is quick to find church folks who applaud the idea that we will soon have a casin...

Ears Opened, Mouth Closed To Learn

  My parents were not blessed with much formal education, but both of them were wise in dealing with the issues of life. Mother and Daddy insisted that their children receive as much formal education as could be attained.   Daddy called it, “book learning.” My sister, brother, and I continued our training in the formal levels of education beyond college graduate degrees. It did not matter that we had surpassed our parent’s levels of formal training; in my opinion, we never reached their level of wisdom. My mother understood the basic principle of economics to be that one must never spend more than they have available. She believed in being frugal in her budget goals for our family. Daddy understood the political world like no one I have even known. He always looked at the character of a person when determining how he was going to cast his vote. With very high moral standards, Daddy held those who represented him to those same standards. As children, we often heard our parents...